DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No. 9157-17 DEC 26 2017 From: Chairman, Board for Correction ofNaval Records To: Secretary ofthe Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions ofreference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "B" Selective Reenlistment Contract (SRB). 2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 November 2017 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence ofrecord. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ofthe enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts ofrecord pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulationswithin the Department ofthe Navy. b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action. " CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration ofall the evidence ofrecord, and especially in light ofthe contents ofenclosure (2), the Board finds the existence ofan injustice warranting the following corrective action. The Petitioner was ill advised to execute a 34 month extension in order to obligate service prior to detaching from former command. However, the Petitioner was only required to execute a 16 month extension. Since the Petitioner's Soft End ofObligated Service (EAOS) was adjusted to reflect , he could not have reenlisted long enough to discount the entire 34 month extension. This impeded the Petitioner from executing a 5 year reenlistment on and become eligible to receive entitlement to a zone "B" SRB. RECOMMENDATION That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: The 34 month extension (NA VPERS 1070/601 ), executed on or about is null and void. The Petitioner executed a 16 month agreement to extend enlistment (NAVPERS 1070/621), on or about . Note: this will satisfy the Petitioner's obligated service requirements per BUPERS Orders. The Petitioner was discharged on and reenlisted on . The term is 5 years. This change will entitle the Petitioner to a zone "B" SRB with an award level of9.0 (100,000 dollar award ceiling) for the rate/NEC. Remaining obligated service to will be deducted from SRB computation. A copy of this Report ofProceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record. 4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record ofthe Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter. 5., Pursuant to the delegation ofauthority set out in Section 6(e) ofthe revised Procedures ofthe Board for Correction ofNaval Records (32 Code ofFederal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority ofreference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf ofthe Secretary ofthe Navy. Executive Director