DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD. SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 
HCG 
Docket No. 6847-16 MAY 0 4 2017 

This is in reference to your application for correction ofyour naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. 
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction ofNaval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2017. Your allegations oferror and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings ofthis Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The advisory opinion provided by HQMC memo 1610 MMRP-13/PERB dated 1August2016, was sent to you on 1August2016 for an opportunity to comment prior to being considered by the Board. After the 30 day period for comment expired without a response, the case was presented to the Board. 
After careful and conscientious consideration ofthe entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence ofprobable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. The Board agreed that all three reports were written in accordance with MCO Pl610.7F and MCO 1610.7. The Board concluded that you have not provided substantial evidence to support that the contested reports are anything other than a true and accurate assessment of your exhibited efforts and results during the reporting periods. According! y, your application has been denied. The names and votes ofthe members ofthe panel will be furnished upon request. 
It is regretted that the circumstances ofyour case are such that favorable action cannot be taken 
at this time. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of 
new and material evidence. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board. 
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all 
official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the 
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 
Sincerely, 

Executive Director