From:  Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records 
To:    Secretary of the Navy 
 
Subj:  REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO   
 
Ref:   (a) Title 10 U.S.C. §1552 
 
Encl:  (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments 
       (2) BUPERS memo 1160 Ser B328/087 dtd 12 Apr 19 
       (3) Subject’s naval record 
 
1.  Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). 
                                              
2.  The Board, consisting of , reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 January 2020 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, relevant portions of Petitioner’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 
 
3.  The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: 
 
     a.  Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy. 
 
     b.  In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action. 
                                
CONCLUSION 
 
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action:  Petitioner erroneously executed a 12-month extension in order to meet obligated service requirement for BUPERS Orders 2676 to August 2018.  The 12-month extension only provided Petitioner with an End of Active Obligated Service (EAOS) to June 2018 vice August 2018.  On 25 May 2018, Petitioner was advised to execute a 26-month extension rather than executing a reenlistment.  If Petitioner’s extension was for 14-months vice 12-months, Petitioner could have executed a 4-year reenlistment on 1 August 2018.  This change would have entitled Petitioner to a zone “A” SRB.   
 
RECOMMENDATION 
 
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: 
 
The 26-month agreement to extend enlistment (NAVPERS 1070/621), executed on 25 May 2018, is null and void.  
 
The 12-month agreement to extend enlistment (NAVPERS 1070/621), executed on 22 May 2017 is modified to reflect 14-months.  This change will change Petitioner’s EAOS to 2 August 2018 vice 2 June 2018.   
 
The Petitioner was discharged 30 September 2018 and reenlisted on 1 August 2018.  The term is 4 years. 
 
This change will entitle the member to a zone “A” SRB with an award level of 5.5 ($60,000 dollar award ceiling) for the SO/5326 rate/NEC.  Remaining obligated service to 2 August 2018 will be deducted from SRB computation. 
                                                            
A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record. 
 
4.  It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter. 
 
5.   Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.