DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No. 1607-18 OCT 2 2018 From: Chairman, Board for Correction ofNaval Records To: Secretary ofthe Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. §1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo 1430 PERS 8031/213 of21Jun18 (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions ofreference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust both E-2 and E-3 Time-in-rate respectively as the result ofa meritorious promotion to E-2. 2. The Board, consisting of , reviewed Petitioner's allegations oferror and injustice on 17 July 2018 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence ofrecord. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ofthe enclosures, relevant portions of the Petitioner's naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts ofrecord pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department ofthe Navy. b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence ofrecord, and especially in light ofthe contents ofenclosure (2), the Board agreed with that Petitioner was meritoriously promoted to E2 upon graduating from A school; however, due to admin oversight, the promotion was never posted in the system, which also affected future E-3 promotion. The Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. RECOMMENDATION That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Petitioner was advanced to AGAAIE2 with an effective date of"7 February 2017" vice "16 May 2017" with a Time in Rate (TIR) date of 1 February 2017. Petitioner was advanced to AGAN/E3 with an effective date of"16 November 2017" vice "16 February 2018" with a Time in Rate (TIR) date of 1November2017. Note: the change in the effective date of advancement to E-3 may also impact on Petitioner's E4 advancement opportunity. IfPetitioner was eligible for, but did not take an E-4 examination because the above change had not yet been made, the following procedures will apply to remediate that missed opportunity. Petitioner should take the next available E-4 advancement examination. Once Petitioner receives the next profile sheet, Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration ofadvancement to E-4 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on the "missed" examination cycle(s). Petitioner should then submit a copy ofthe worksheet for missed cycle(s). In addition, Petitioner should submit a DD Form 149, command endorsement/recommendation, and must include a copy ofthis letter with the request. The Board will then determine whether the request will be approved. Note: Defense Finance & Accounting Service (DFAS) will complete an audit ofPetitioner's records to determine if Petitioner is due any back pay and allowances. A copy ofthis Report ofProceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record. 4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record ofthe d's proceedings in the above entitled matter. Recorder 5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6( e) ofthe revised Procedures ofthe Board for Correction ofNaval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority ofreference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf ofthe Secretary ofthe Navy. Executive Director