DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No: 3841-18 Ref: Signature Date From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. § 1552 (b) MCO P1070.12K W/CH 1 (IRAM) Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) NAVMC 118(11) counseling entries of 28 Aug 17 (3) SJA, 1st MarDiv ltr 1910 of 23 Feb 18 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former non-commissioned officer of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board, requesting that his record be corrected by removing the counseling entries dated 28 August 2017. 2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2019 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, relevant portions of Petitioner’s naval records, the enclosed 15 July 2019 advisory opinion (AO) from the Office of the Staff Judge Advocate (SJS) to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. 3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulation within the Department of the Navy. b. Petitioner contends the counseling entries are unjust because an administrative separation board did not find proven the basis alleged in support of his proposed separation. c. On 28 August 2017, Petitioner was issued enclosure (2), a counseling entry for a positive result from the Navy Drug Screening Laboratory (NDSL) returned on 11 July 2017 indicating the use of cocaine, and a counseling entry restricting Petitioner’s promotion to the next higher grade for 18 months for drug abuse while under the “Administrative Separation process.” d. On 30 January 2018, Petitioner was the subject of an administrative separation board. The administrative separation board found by a preponderance of the evidence that Petitioner did not commit any of the acts or omissions alleged and recommended his retention. e. In correspondence at enclosure (3), the SJA, noted that “[t]he drug testing laboratory was decertified prior to testing” Petitioner’s urine, and that an inspection following the test revealed additional discrepancies in the testing process. The SJA concluded by stating that “I do not recommend pursuing Secretarial Authority to separate SNM. Instead I recommend retaining the Marine.” f. In its AO, the SJA to the Commandant of the Marine Corps noted that the allegation on which Petitioner’s proposed separation was based was not substantiated, and that Petitioner’s commanding general (CG) decided not to request Secretarial Authority to override the administrative separation board. The AO concluded by recommending that, “[w]hile these counseling entries were not erroneous or unjust at the time they were given, it would be unjust to keep them in his record, in light of the board results.” CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting corrective action. The Board noted that the counseling entries were not in error or unjust when issued. However, the Board substantially concurred with the AO and determined that—based on the decisions by the administrative separation board and Petitioner’s CG, and in light of the evidence against the drug testing laboratory—it would be unjust to keep the counseling entries in Petitioner’s record. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the counseling entries dated 28 August 2017 shall be removed from Petitioner’s record. RECOMMENDATION In view of the above, the Board directs the following corrective action. Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the NAVMC 118(11) counseling entries dated 28 August 2017. Any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed, or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record, and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future. This includes, but is not limited to, all information systems/database entries that reference or discuss the material being expunged. 4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above-entitled matter. 5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)), and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.