Docket No: 0594-18 Ref: Signature date Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application was denied. Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on its merits. Your request was carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session on The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, as well as applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active duty on 16 July 1996. On 21 February 1997, you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for failure to obey an order or regulation. On 12 December 1997, you received NJP for unauthorized absence of 6 days and failure to obey an order or regulation. On 18 November 1999, you were convicted at a special court-martial of two specifications of unauthorized absence, one specification of missing movement, and one specification of wrongful possession of drug paraphernalia. The court- martial sentenced you to a bad-conduct discharge. Appellate review of your case was completed on 30 January 2001 and you separated from active duty on 8 February 2001 with a bad-conduct discharge. The Naval Discharge Review Board notified you that your discharge was proper on 13 September 2010. The Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your request for an upgrade to a general discharge and your pride in being a Marine, your age and maturity. In addition, the Board reviewed the fact your enlistment was almost completed and your admissions regarding unauthorized absences and assertion that you never deserted. The Board considered your entire period of service as well as your assertion that you do not want any unearned VA benefits. The Board cannot set aside a court-martial conviction but may change the discharge through clemency. The Board noted that you did not provide any documentation beyond your statement to support your request for clemency. The Board concluded your mitigating factors and assertions were not sufficient to warrant a change to your discharge given your misconduct, which resulted in two NJPs and a court-martial conviction. With regard to veterans’ benefits, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility of veterans for benefits under their own regulations. You may be eligible for benefits for a limited period of your service. You may find more information and apply at your local VA office. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149. New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.