DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON; VA 22204-2490 Dear Docket No: 830-18 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions ofTitle 10, United States Code, Section 1552. After careful and conscientious consideration ofthe entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. A three-member panel ofthe Board for Correction ofNaval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on-11 April 2018. The names and votes of the members ofthe panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings ofthis Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The enclosed advisory opinion (AO) provided in Headquarters, Marine Corps memorandum dated 26 January 2018 was sent to you for an opportunity to comment prior to being considered by the Board. After the period for comment expired without a response, the case was presented to the Board. The Board carefully considered your desire to remove the fitness report for the reporting period 1July2015 to 9 February 2016 from your official military personnel file. The Board considered your contention that the report was in retaliation for going against the good order and discipline that govern the institution. The Board significantly concurred with the AO and found no evidence of retaliation, and concluded that you did not sufficiently substantiate the existence of an error or injustice. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken at this time. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new and material evidence. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board.