DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 

Docket No. 10141-19 
Ref: Signature Date 

Dear :
 
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.  After careful and conscientious consideration of relevant portions of your naval record and your application, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.  Consequently, your application has been denied
 
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on May 21, 2020.  The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.  Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion contained in HQMC memo 1820 MMSR-5 of 29 Jan 20 and your response to the opinion.
  
You requested that your anniversary date be designated back to July 26 vice August 17.  The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, to include your assertions.  However, the Board concluded that you have been credited a partial satisfactory year for the period of active duty served while in the Naval Academy Preparatory School (NAPS) from July 26, 1995 through July 1, 1996.  There is no evidence in your record that you performed inactive duty drills prior to July 26, 1995.  You entered the U.S. Naval Academy on July 2, 1996 through August 16, 2000.  This period is not creditable service, therefore there is no loss points and a full satisfactory year cannot granted for a partial year of service. You were first commissioned effective August 17, 2000 and is based on your reentry after a break in service of greater than 24 hours.  In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
 
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149.  New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.  

Sincerely,