Dear ,  
 
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.  Your case was reconsidered in accordance with Board for Correction of Naval Records procedures that conform to Lipsman v. Secretary of the Army, 335 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2004).  You previously petitioned the Board for a disability retirement and were denied relief on 25 August 1995.  Your requests for reconsideration were denied on 12 June 2001, 31 January 2002, 27 August 2004, and 21 September 2010.  Further, you requested review of the Board’s decisions to the Secretary of the Navy and were denied relief on 5 November 2010 in a letter from Assistant General Counsel (Manpower and Reserve Affairs). 
 
On 10 December 2010, the decision by Assistant General Counsel (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) was affirmed by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) in a letter to Congresswoman .  The Assistant Secretary is delegated with Board oversight authority by Secretary of the Navy and serves as the final Department of the Navy authority on Board matters.  Based on the Secretary’s decision to affirm the denial of relief in your case, Assistant General Counsel’s decision in your case was considered a final agency action.  You were informed of this decision in letter dated 10 February 2019 based on a subsequent request for reconsideration. 
 
Your current application was reviewed for evidence not previously considered by the Board and found not to contain any new evidence.  In your current application, you again raise an argument that you were erroneously discharged and provided excerpts from your military and Department of Veterans Affairs record as evidence of the error.  The Board previously considered your military record and Department of Veterans Affairs evidence in making their determination.  Absent new evidence that addresses the Board’s finding that your discharge was not erroneous, your request for reconsideration is denied and your case is hereby administratively closed.     
 
It is regretted that the circumstances of your reconsideration petition are such that favorable action cannot be taken again.  You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new and material evidence.  New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board.  In the absence of sufficient new and material evidence for reconsideration, the decision of the Board is final, and your only recourse would be to seek relief, at no cost to the Board, from a court of appropriate jurisdiction.  It is important to keep in mind that a 
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.