Docket No: 10743-19 
Ref: Signature Date 

 
Dear  : 
 
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Section 1552 of Title 10, United States Code.  After careful and conscientious consideration of relevant portions of your naval record and your application, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.  Consequently, your application has been denied.    
 
5 January 2021.  The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.  Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations, and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, as well as the 7 November 2019 advisory opinion (AO) furnished by the Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB).  The AO was provided to you on 7 November 2019, and you were given 30 days in which to submit a response.  When you did not provide a response, your case was submitted to the Board for consideration.  
 
The Board determined that your personal appearance, with or without counsel, would not materially add to their understanding of the issues involved.  Therefore, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record. 
 
The Board carefully considered your request to remove your fitness report for the reporting period 2 August 2018 to 30 March 2019.  The Board considered your contentions that: (a) you were not notified of the need to improve your performance, and your fitness report was not sent to you for counseling prior to submission; (b) you felt targeted by your reporting senior (RS) because you are both logisticians and you completed tasks differently than he would; (c) others communicated that he treated you differently, and that your RS advised them that he believed you were immature; and (d) you reached out to your RS, and he agreed to a brief phone call, during which, he stated that his “top captains” deployed with him and were assigned to the Marine Expeditionary Unit with him.   
 
The Board, however, substantially concurred with the AO that your fitness report is valid and should be retained as filed.  In this regard, the Board noted that the Marine Corps Performance Evaluation System (PES) Manual does not require counseling, and reporting officials are not required to provide a copy of the fitness report to Marines prior to processing.  The Board also noted that the PES Manual does not require reporting officials to provide the Marine Reported On with their profile.  The Board determined that your RS managed his profile, and submitted your fitness report according to PES Manual guidance.  Moreover, the Board found no evidence that you RS acted inappropriately and you provided none.  Accordingly, the Board concluded that there is no probable material error or injustice warranting corrective action.  
 
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149.  New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.   
 
Sincerely,