Dear : 
 
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Section 1552 of Title 10, United States Code.  After careful and conscientious consideration of relevant portions of your naval record and your application, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.  Consequently, your application has been denied. 
 
A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2021.  The names and votes of the panel members will be furnished upon request.  Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of the Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.  The Board also considered the 31 July 2019 advisory opinion (AO) furnished by the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), which was previously provided to you.  Although you were afforded an opportunity to submit a rebuttal, you did not do so. 
 
The Board carefully considered your request to remove your fitness report for the reporting period 7 August 2018 to 5 November 2018.  The Board considered your assertion that your reviewing officer (RO) wrote a letter stating that he overlooked that he was your RO on the preceding fitness report.  The Board also considered your contention that, although mistakes do happen, you believe that the contested report was not a mistake, rather it declined from the preceding report due to some issues that you brought to light through a request mast, which led to investigations, and ultimately reflected the contested report in a negative way.   
 
The Board noted that on 7 November 2019, the PERB modified your contested report by marking Section K, Item 3 (Comparative Assessment) in block 4 (Professionals Who Form The) vice block 2 (A Qualified Marine).  The Board determined that the report, as modified by the PERB, is valid, and that removal of the report would constitute an excessive degree of redress.   
 
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new matters, which will require that you complete and submit a new DD Form 149.  New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 
 
 Sincerely,