Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Section 1552 of Title 10, United States Code. After careful and conscientious consideration of relevant portions of your naval record and your application, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2021. The names and votes of the panel members will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of the Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board carefully considered your request to remove your 8 April 2019 nonjudicial punishment (NJP). The Board considered your contentions that it is questionable if your appeal was properly handled and addressed, and that your punishment was disproportionate when considering the nature of the offense the absence of aggravating circumstance, and your overall record. The Board, however, determined that your contentions are without merit. Specifically, you were charged with Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for violating the Liberty Policy. You admitted to said violation of Article 92, and your commanding officer found sufficient evidence for a finding of guilty. On appeal, the Commanding General, determined that the imposition of NJP was not disproportional to the offense charged, and concurred with the Regimental Commander that the awarding of 60 days restriction was unnecessary given your Tier 3 liberty status, he suspended the punishment for a period of six months. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new matters, which will require that you complete and submit a new DD Form 149. New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, 2/25/2021 Deputy Director