Dear : 
 
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Section 1552 of Title 10, United States Code.  After careful and conscientious consideration of relevant portions of your naval record and your application, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.  Consequently, your application has been denied. 
 
A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2021.  The names and votes of the panel members will be furnished upon request.  Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of the Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.   
 
The Board carefully considered your request to remove your 5 August 2015 and your 18 August 2017 Administrative Remarks (Page 11) 6105 counseling entries.  The Board considered your contention that the 5 August 2015 Page 11 is in error because it was understood between you and your sergeant major that it would not be entered into your record because you were experiencing severe abdominal pains during your pregnancy; however the 6105 was entered into your record 16 months later as reprisal for requesting mast.  The Board also considered your contention that the 18 August 2017 Page 11 is unjust because the leadership at your command, your occupational field sponsor, and your monitor were aware of your husband’s debarment from base, as well as your high risk pregnancy, and that you were still issued orders to  in reprisal of your request mast. 
 
The Board noted that there is no evidence in the record, and you submitted none, that substantiates your allegations of reprisal.  Additionally, the Board determined that the issuing officers of each Page 11 entry were within their discretionary authority to issue the counselings.  The Board determined that the entries create a permanent record of a matter that each one deemed significant enough to document, and your evidence did not show otherwise.  The Board also determined that the entries meet the 6105 counseling requirements detailed in MCO 1900.16 (MARCORSEPMAN).  Specifically, the Board noted that the entries provided written notification concerning your deficiencies, specific recommendations for corrective action indicating any assistance available, a comprehensive explanation of the consequences of failure to successfully take the recommended corrective action, and a reasonable opportunity to undertake the recommended corrective action.  You were afforded the opportunity to rebut the counselings.  You chose not to submit a rebuttal for the 5 August 2015 Page 11 entry, and your rebuttal for the 18 August 2017 Page 11 entry is filed in your record.  The Board thus concluded that the Page 11 entries do not constitute probable material error or injustice warranting removal from your OMPF.   
 
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new matters, which will require that you complete and submit a new DD Form 149.  New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 
 
 Sincerely,