Docket No: 11779-19 Ref: Signature Date Dear : This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Section 1552 of Title 10, United States Code. After careful and conscientious consideration of relevant portions of your naval record and your application, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. Although you did not file your application in a timely manner, the statute of limitation was waived in accordance with the 25 August 2017 guidance from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (Kurta Memo). A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2021. The names and votes of the panel members will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, to include the Kurta Memo, the 3 September 2014 guidance from the Secretary of Defense regarding discharge upgrade requests by Veterans claiming post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Hagel Memo), and the 25 July 2018 guidance from the Under Secretary of In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion (AO) furnished by a qualified mental health professional dated 31 January 2021, which was previously provided to you. You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 27 December 1993. On 28 December 1993, you were briefed on the Navy’s policy regarding drug and alcohol abuse. On 8 February 1995, you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for 27 days of unauthorized absence and missing ship’s movement. On 28 February 1995, you received NJP for wrongful use of marijuana. Additionally, you were notified of administrative discharge action for misconduct due to drug abuse. After being afforded your procedural rights, you elected to waive your right to have your case heard before an administrative discharge board. On 1 March 1995, your case was forwarded to the separation authority recommending your separation from the Navy due to drug abuse. On 14 March 1995, the separation authority directed your discharge with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service due to drug abuse, and on 17 March 1995, you were discharged from the Navy. A qualified mental health professional reviewed your request for correction to your record and provided the Board with an AO regarding your assertion that you were suffering from PTSD during your service. The AO noted that the preponderance of available objective evidence fails to establish you were diagnosed with PTSD, suffered from PTSD at the time of your military service, or your in-service misconduct could be attributed to PTSD or other mental health condition. The Board carefully considered all potentially mitigating factors to determine whether the interests of justice warrant relief in your case in accordance with the Wilkie Memo. These included, but were not limited to your statement that you did not know then, that there was a name for what you were feeling and living with for so long, and it is now widely known as depression and PTSD. However based upon its review, the Board concluded these potentially mitigating factors were insufficient to warrant relief. Specifically, the Board determined that your misconduct, as evidenced by your two NJPs, one of which was for wrongful drug use, outweighed these mitigating factors. Additionally, the Board concurred with the AO that the preponderance of available objective evidence fails to establish you were diagnosed with PTSD, suffered from PTSD at the time of your military service, or that your in-service misconduct could be attributed to PTSD or other mental health condition. Accordingly, given the totality of the circumstances, the Board determined that your request does not merit relief. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149. New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely,