Docket No: 3503-19 Ref: Signature Date Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on its merits. A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2020. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 6 January 1983. On 17 February 1984 and 16 February 1985, you received non-judicial punishment (NJP) for wrongful use of marijuana. Subsequently, you were notified of an administrative action to separate you from the naval service because of misconduct due to drug abuse. You were advised of, and elected your procedural rights, to consult with and be represented by military counsel, and your right to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB). An ADB was convened and found that you committed misconduct and recommended administrative discharge from the naval service with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service. Your Commanding Officer (CO) concurred with the ADB’s recommendation. The separation authority approved the recommendation and directed that you be separated from the naval service with an OTH characterization of service. On 9 May 1985, you were so discharged. The Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors in your case, including your desire upgrade your discharge. The Board considered your contention that you were not properly represented and that no one listened to your part of the story. After careful consideration, the Board concluded that these factors were insufficient to warrant relief in your case because of the seriousness of your misconduct that resulted in two NJPs for wrongful drug use in light of the Navy’s policy. Regarding your contention, there is no evidence in your record and you presented none to support your contention that you were not properly represented. Under the totality of the circumstances, the Board discerned no probable material error or injustice in the discharge. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149. New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, 7/9/2020