DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No: 4288-19 Ref: Signature Date This letter is in reference to your application of 18 November 2019 for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your case on its merits. A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2020. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations, and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, as well as the enclosed 27August 2019 advisory opinion (AO) furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) (PERS-803). The AO was provided to you on 3 September 2019, and you were given 30 days in which to submit a response. When you did not provide a response, your case was submitted to the Board for consideration. Regarding your request for a personal appearance, the Board determined that a personal appearance with or without counsel will not materially add to their understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record. The Board carefully considered your request for promotion to the paygrade E-7 and retroactive retirement pay as an E-7 for three years from 2003 to 2006. The Board considered your contention that your enlisted service record substantiates your sustained superior performance for promotion to E-7. You claim that your advancement was wrongfully denied by an infuriating combination of indifference and incompetence. The Board, however, substantially concurred with PERS-803 that there is not enough key supporting documentation to support your request. The Board found no evidence of your Navy Wide Advancement Exam profile sheet or performance ratings and you provided none. The Board thus concluded that there is no probable material error or injustice warranting corrective action. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149. New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, 5/15/2020