Docket No: 4465-19 Ref: Signature Date This letter is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2020. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, as well as applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board also considered the enclosed 10 April 2019 advisory opinion (AO) furnished by the Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), which was previously provided to you. Although you were afforded an opportunity to submit a rebuttal, you did not do so. The Board carefully considered your request to remove the Section K reviewing officer (RO) portion of your fitness report for the reporting period 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018. The Board considered your contention that your RO was biased against the Marines in your military occupational specialty (MOS), and that he gave higher marks to all of the Marines in a different MOS. The Board, however, substantially concurred with the PERB that your request to modify the contested report lacks merit. The Board noted that you failed to provide any evidence, other than your statement, that the RO’s comparative assessment is invalid because of bias. Additionally, there is no applicable Performance Evaluation System manual guidance that requires the RO to take MOS apportionment into account when evaluating respective Marines reported on. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149. New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.