This letter is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.  After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.  Consequently, your application has been denied. 
 
A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2020.  The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.  Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, as well as applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.  The Board also considered the enclosed 22 August 2019 advisory opinion (AO) furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (PERS-32), which was previously provided to you.  Although you were afforded an opportunity to submit a rebuttal, you did not do so. 
 
The Board carefully considered your request to remove your evaluation report and counseling record initially issued for the reporting period 16 November 2016 to 6 April 2017, and to update your Performance Summary Report (PSR) to reflect your new trait average.  The Board considered your contentions that there was an administrative error in the initial evaluation, and that your commanding officer submitted a memorandum with a replacement evaluation that has different individual trait averages.  You argue that it is unnecessary for both evaluations to be in your official military personnel file (OMPF). 
 
The Board, however, substantially concurred with the AO and determined that your reporting senior (RS) properly submitted a Letter-Supplement and revised evaluation to make corrections to the original report.  The Board noted that BUPERS Instruction 1610.10D does not require removal of the original evaluation report nor are changes made to the PSR.  The AO also noted that PERS-32 made the necessary corrections to your record and no other corrections are required.  The Board thus concluded that your evaluation report does not constitute probable material error or injustice warranting removal from your OMPF. 
 
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new matters, which will require that you complete and submit a new DD Form 149.  New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.