Docket No: 6007-19 
Ref: Signature Date 
  
Dear : 
 
This letter is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.  After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.  Consequently, your application has been denied. 
 
A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2020.  The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.  Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations, and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, as well as the enclosed 21 May 2019 advisory opinion (AO) furnished by the Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB).  The AO was provided to you on 21 May 2019, and you were given 30 days in which to submit a response.  When you did not provide a response, your case was submitted to the Board for consideration. 
 
The Board carefully considered your request to remove your fitness report for the reporting period 1 April 2015 to 22 June 2015.  The Board considered your contentions that your reporting officials pointed out events that do not reflect your leadership, there were some leadership challenges, but your reporting officials did not allow room for challenges, and your reporting officials did not state the actions you took to correct the issues.  You also contend that your reviewing officer (RO) was opinionated, judgmental, and biased against you, and your reporting officials did not justify your marks.  You claim that contrary to the Third Officer Sighter’s comments, you did make statements to address every event with details. 
 
The Board, however, substantially concurred with the AO that your fitness report is valid and should be retained as filed.  In this regard, the Board noted that your fitness report was marked adverse for performance and your reporting senior (RS) justified your adverse mark with specific incidents and dates.  The Board determined that as the Guard Force Officer in Charge and Operations Officer, your reporting officials were in positions to accurately assess your performance.  The Board also determined that your reporting officials are not required to comment on your corrective actions, nor are they required to justify marks that are not adverse.  The Board found no evidence that your performance was not adverse and that your RO was biased against you, and you provided none.  The Board thus concluded that there is no probable material error or injustice warranting corrective action. 
 
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149.  New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 
 
Sincerely,