Dear   
 
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.  After careful and conscientious consideration of relevant portions of your naval record and your application, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.  Consequently, your application has been denied.     
 
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2020.  The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.  Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion contained in Navy Personnel Command memorandum 1780 PERS-311 of 13 December 2019; a copy of which was previously provided to you for comment. 
 
On 5 August 2011, you were commissined as an Ensign in the inactive U.S. Navy Reserve, and signed your service agreement (Armed Forces Health Prefessions Scholarship Program (AFHPSP) Medical Students, Dental Students, and Medical Service Corps Students (1975X, 1985, and 1995X).  On 29 June 2012, you disenrolled from the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB).  On 16 May 2015, you were appointed as an Lieutenant in the Active U.S. Navy. 
 
You requested that your MGIB disenrollment be reversed; the Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, to include your assertions.  However, the Board concluded that your election was properly documented, and your decision to disenroll from the MGIB program is irrevocable.  In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. 
 
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149.  New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.    
 
      Sincerely,