Docket No: 6705-19 Ref: Signature Date Dear This letter is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2020. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board carefully considered your request to remove your 23 February 2017 Administrative Remarks (page 11) 6105 counseling entry from your official military personnel file (OMPF). The Board considered your contention that your rebuttal was not submitted for inclusion in your record. You claim that you submitted a rebuttal, and you told your command to resend your rebuttal, however, it is still not in your record. The Board noted that pursuant to paragraph 6105 of Marine Corps Order (MCO) 1900.16 (2015 ed.), the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MARCORSEPMAN), you were issued a 6105 entry counseling you for misuse of your Government Travel Charge Card (GTCC). The Board also noted that, pursuant to MCO 1070.12K, the Marine Corps Individual Records Administration Manual (IRAM), you were properly counseled and determined that the contested entry was written and issued in accordance with the IRAM. Specifically, the entry provided written notification concerning your deficiencies, specific recommendations for corrective action, where to seek assistance, and consequences for failure to take corrective action and it afforded you the opportunity to submit a rebuttal. Moreover, the entry was signed by your commanding officer, and he/she determined that your misconduct was a matter that was essential to record, as it was his/her right to do. After a review of your application, the Board found no evidence of your rebuttal statement and thus concluded that there is no probable material error or injustice warranting corrective action. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149. New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely,