From:  Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records 
To:     Secretary of the Navy 
 
Subj:   REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD  
              
 
Ref:   (a) Title 10 U.S.C. §1552 
       (b) MILPERSMAN 1160-030 
 
Encl:   (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments 
        (2) CMSB memo 1160 Ser B328/181 of 01 Oct 19 
        (3) Subject’s naval record 
 
1.  Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner’s Reserve Active Duty Obligation (RADO) reflect 72 months vice 6 months.  
 
2.  The Board, consisting of , reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2020 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, relevant portions of Petitioner’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 
 
3.  The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: 
 
     a.  Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy. 
 
     b.  In accordance with reference (b), FTS (Full Time Support) personnel who reenlist will require that the RADO be the same as the term of reenlistment.  
 
     c.  On 30 April 2004, Petitioner enlisted for 8 years in the U.S. Naval Reserve.  Furthermore, Petitioner signed a NAVCRUIT 1133/52 (Enlistment Guarantee) listing Option (1) TEP (TAR Enlistment Program) Personnel-man “A” School Program Guarantee in the U.S. Naval Reserve. 
 
     d.  On 31 March 2019, Petitioner reenlisted for 6 years in the U.S. Navy Reserve, listing a RADO of 6 months. 
 
     e.  In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action. 
 
CONCLUSION  
 
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.  The Board concluded that an error was made to Petitioner’s reenlistment (31 March 2019) listing a RADO of 6 months vice 72 months.  Petitioner’s RADO is required to match years she reenlisted for.    
 
RECOMMENDATION 
 
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: 
 
The immediate reenlistment contract (NAVPERS 1070/601) executed on 31 March 2019 listed a Reserve Active Duty Obligation (RADO) of “072/000” Months/days vice “006/000” Months/days, 
 
A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record. 
 
4.  It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter. 
 
5.   Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.