Docket No. 7975-19 Ref: Signature Date Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on its merits. A three-member panel of the Board sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2020. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 22 July 1975. On 12 August 1976 you submitted a request for an undesirable discharge for the good of the service to escape trial by court-martial for multiple periods of unauthorized absence. However, on 31 August 1976 your request was denied and you were retained on active duty. On 18 January 1977 pursuant to your guilty pleas, you were convicted at a Special Court Martial (SPCM) for two specifications of UA lasting 88 and 129 days, respectively. You received as punishment, confinement for three months, forfeitures of pay, and a discharge from the Marine Corps with a Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD). On 29 March 1977 the Convening Authority approved your sentence as adjudged and partially suspended the BCD, confinement in excess of three months, and forfeiture of $240 per month in excess of three months, for the period of confinement and one year; after which time, unless sooner vacated, the suspended portion was to be remitted without further action. Upon the completion of the post-trial appellate review process in your case, you were discharged from the Marine Corps with a BCD on 12 July 1978. Your contention that you suffered from a generalized anxiety disorder on active duty was fully and carefully considered by the Board in light of the guidance provided by the Secretary of Defense’s Memorandum, “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records Considering Discharge Upgrade Requested by Veterans Claiming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder” of 3 September 2014, and the "Clarifying Guidance to Military Discharge Review Board and Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records Considering Requests by Veterans for Modification of their Discharge Due to Mental Health Conditions, Sexual Assault, or Sexual Harassment" memorandum of 25 August 2017. The Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such your contentions that included, but were not limited to: (a) you have been diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder and are addressing it through mental health counseling and medication management, (b) if your anxiety disorder had been diagnosed on active duty you would have been able to get the assistance necessary to manage your condition and complete your term of service, and (c) if you had the ability to go back and do it over, you would have made a different choice and worked through those last ten months of your four-year enlistment. Unfortunately, the Board determined these mitigating factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant upgrading your discharge or granting any other requested relief in your case. In accordance with the published guidance, the Board gave liberal and special consideration to your record of service, and your contentions about any traumatic or stressful events you experienced and their possible adverse impact on your service. However, even under the liberal consideration standard, the Board concluded that there was no convincing evidence that you suffered from any type of mental health condition while on active duty, or that any such mental health conditions were related to or mitigated the misconduct that formed the basis of your discharge. As a result, the Board concluded that your misconduct was not due to mental health-related symptoms. Moreover, the Board observed that you did not submit any active duty or post-service clinical documentation or treatment records to support your mental health claims despite a request from the Board on 1 October 2019 to specifically provide additional documentary material. The Board also noted your contention that either your service number or social security number is incorrect, but you did not provide any evidence to indicate which number is potentially inaccurate (e.g., a copy of your Social Security Card). Additionally, absent a material error or injustice, the Board generally will not summarily upgrade a discharge solely for the purpose of facilitating Veterans Administration benefits, or enhancing educational or employment opportunities. Lastly, there is no provision of federal law or in Navy/Marine Corps regulations that allows for a discharge to be automatically upgraded after a specified period of time. Accordingly, the Board determined that there was no impropriety or inequity in your discharge, and even under the liberal consideration standard, the Board concluded that your serious misconduct merited your receipt of a BCD. The Board also noted that, although it cannot set aside a conviction, it might grant clemency in the form of changing a characterization of discharge, even one awarded by a court-martial. However, the Board concluded that, despite your contentions, this is not a case warranting any clemency. The fact remains is that you were properly convicted at a SPCM of serious misconduct, and the Board did not find any evidence of an error or injustice in this application that warrants upgrading your BCD. Additionally, the Board reviewed your application under the recent guidance provided in the Under Secretary of Defense’s memorandum dated 25 July 2018 entitled, “Guidance to Military Discharge Review Boards and Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records Regarding Equity, Injustice, or Clemency Determinations” (USD Memo). The purpose of the USD Memo is to ease the process for veterans seeking redress and assist Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records “in determining whether relief is warranted on the basis of equity, injustice, or clemency.” The USD Memo noted that “increasing attention is being paid to…the circumstances under which citizens should be considered for second chances and the restoration of rights forfeited,” and that “BCM/NRs have the authority to upgrade discharges or correct military records to ensure fundamental fairness.” The USD Memo sets clear standards and principles to guide BCM/NRs in application of their equitable relief authority, and further explains that boards shall consider a number of factors to determine whether to grant relief. However, even in light of the USD Memo, the Board still concluded that, given the totality of the circumstances, your request does not merit relief. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149. New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely,