DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No. 841-19 Ref: Signature Date From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. § 1552 (b) OPNAVINST 6110.1J Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/enclosures (2) CO, NOSC, Newport ltr 6110 Ser N00/206 of 12 Oct 17 (3) PRPO ltr 5420 OPNAV N170 of 14 Feb 19 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board), requesting that his record be corrected by changing his Physical Readiness Information Management System (PRIMS) record to reflect his Cycle 2-2016 physical fitness assessment (PFA) results. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2020 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, relevant portions of Petitioner’s naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. 3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, found as follows: a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulation within the Department of the Navy. b. Petitioner contends that due to an administrative error, the actual scores were not entered and were instead marked “incomplete.” Petitioner’s commanding officer (CO) submitted enclosure (2), a letter of correction to the Navy Personnel Command (OPNAV N170B). However, corrections were not made to his PRIMS record. c. In an advisory opinion (AO) at enclosure (3), OPNAV N170 determined that they would take no action to change the record. The AO determined that, in order to update Petitioner’s PRIMS record, official scoresheets for Cycle 2,-2016 must be provided, or a letter of correction citing “program mismanagement” if official scoresheets were not retained per reference (b). CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board determined that Petitioner’s request warrants relief. The Board concurred with the AO that Petitioner’s evidence lacked the required official scoresheet and a letter of correction citing “program mismanagement.” However, the Board determined that Petitioner’s evidence and supporting material, specifically his CO’s letter at enclosure (2), is sufficient evidence and justification to correct his PRIMS record, as requested. The Board thus concluded that Petitioner’s PRIMS record shall reflect that he passed his Cycle 2-2016 PFA, using the data provided at enclosure (2). RECOMMENDATION In view of the above, the Board recommends the following corrective action. Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by modifying his PRIMS record to reflect that he passed his Cycle 2-2016 PFA, using the data provided at enclosure (2). Any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed, or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record, and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future. This includes, but is not limited to, all information systems or database entries that reference or discuss the expunged material. 4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above-entitled matter. 5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)), and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy. Sincerely, 4/16/2020