Dear   
 
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.  After careful and conscientious consideration of relevant portions of your naval record and your application, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.  Consequently, your application has been denied. 
 
A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 October 2020.  The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.  Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion contained in Navy Personnel Command memorandum 1430 PERS 8031/0077 of 25 February 2020 and Office of the Chief of Naval Operations letter 5420 OPNAV N170 of 23 January 2020; a copy of which was previously provided to you for comment.   
 
You requested your Physical Readiness Information Management System (PRIMS) record for the Cycle 2, 2017 Physical Fitness Assessment be changed to pregnancy vice fail status and advancement to Fire Controlman Third Class (FC3)/E-4.  The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, to include your assertions.  The Board concluded that OPNAV (N170) corrected your PRIMS record as requested.  However, you did not meet the requirement for advancement to FC3/E-4 in December 2017 in accordance with Military Personnel Manual article 1510-030.  Specifically, the aforementioned policy requires “A” school completion; 6-months time in rate as an E-3; all requirements completed for advancement in rate; a performance appraisal review; and Commanding Officer’s recommendation.  There is no evidence that you had your Commanding Officer’s recommendation at the time requested.  In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. 
 
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149.  New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.   
 
Sincerely, 
           
12/3/2020
Deputy Director