DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S COURTHOUSE ROAD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. § 1552 (b) DODI 1215.13 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC ltr 5730 Ser 91/020 of 6 Feb 20 (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove unsatisfactory participation from 2006 through 2009. 2. The Board, consisting of , , and reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2020 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, relevant portions of Petitioner’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, found that, before applying to this Board, he exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy. The Board made the following findings: a. In accordance with reference (b), Selected Reserve enlisted members who fulfilled their mandatory service obligation but were unsatisfactory participants were to be transferred from a drilling status to the Individual Ready Reserve, Standby Reserve or discharged. b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action. c. Petitioner enlisted in the U.S. Navy on 16 December 1997. d. Petitioner entered active duty on 30 March 1998. e. On 29 March 2002, Petitioner was released from active duty and transferred to the Navy Reserve to complete military service obligation. f. Petitioner began drilling on 22 June 2002. g. On 11 March 2006, Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy Reserve a term of 6-years. h. Petitioner’s inactive duty training (IDT) history reflects he completed drills on 11/12 March 2006 (4 periods), thereafter Petitioner’ IDT participation was recorded as unexcused absences (some of which were cancelled) and authorized absences through June 2009. i. Petitioner resumed drilling on 18 July 2009. j. Petitioner executed a 12-month extension on 11 March 2012. k. Petitioner reenlisted on 29 July 2012 for a term of 6-years. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of error and injustice warranting the following corrective action. Although Petitioner executed a 6-year reenlistment on 11 March 2006, the Board found that sufficient evidence was provided to reflect significant administrative errors resulting in Petitioner’s record reflecting unsatisfactory participation from March 2006 through June 2009. For this reason, the Board felt that under these circumstances, relief is warranted. RECOMMENDATION That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Petitioner’s NAVPERS 1070/601, Immediate Reenlistment executed on 11 March 2006 for a term of 6-years and NAVPERS 1070/621, Agreement to Extend Enlistment executed on 11 March 2012 for a term of 12-months is null and void. Petitioner executed NAVPERS 1070/621, Agreement to Extend Enlistment on 16 December 2005 for a term of 4-months. Petitioner was issued NAVPERS 1070/615, Record of Discharge from the U.S. Navy Reserve on 15 April 2006. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy Reserve as an Aviation Boatswain’s Mate First Class (ABH1)/E-6 on 18 July 2009 for a term of 4-years. Note: This change reflects 3-years, 3-months and 3-days break in service. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record. 4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above-entitled matter. 5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)), and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of the reference, has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.