ex-HR, USN
ND07-00700

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received:  20070501	Characterization Received:  
Narrative Reason:  COURT MARTIAL CONVICTION 	Authority:  MILPERSMAN 3640420

Applicant’s Request:	Characterization change to:  
			Narrative Reason change to: 
Applicant’s Issues:	1.  Post service 

Decision

By a vote of  the Characterization shall  .
By a vote of  the Narrative Reason shall  COURT MARTIAL CONVICTION.

Date:  20071213     		Location:  Washington D.C	 Representation:  

Discussion
Issue 1 (Clemency).  The Applicant admits that he was AWOL and under the influence of drugs and alcohol during his period of absence, but has not had any significant problems with the law since being discharged.  The Applicant also contends that he has been attending church weekly and is enrolled in college and, therefore is requesting a general discharge.  In response to the Applicant’s request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts.  With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.  Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.  The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency.  The NDRB found the evidence of record did not contain sufficient post service, mitigating or extenuating factors to offset the seriousness of the offense for which the bad conduct discharge was awarded.  Applicant did not produce any evidence of educational accomplishments, a verifiable and continuous employment record, documentation of community service, or certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.  Accordingly, the reason for discharge, conviction by special court-martial, is most appropriate.  

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.  After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Court-Martial proceedings, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses that he committed. 

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USNR (DEP)	19880311 - 19880502  		Active:   	19880503 - 19911015  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19911016	Years Contracted:  ; Extension:  	Date of Discharge:  19970508
Length of Service:  05  Yrs  06  Mths  22  Dys	Lost Time:  Days UA:  94  Days of Pre-Trial Confined:  82
Education Level:  	Age at Enlistment:  	AFQT:  68	Highest Rank/Rate:  HM2
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):	Performance:  3.4(5)	Behavior:  3.5(6)	 OTA:  3.63 
Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):  NDSM, SSDR, FMFR, GCA, EPB, SRB

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19911016:	Reenlisted this date for a term of 6 years.

19940411:	NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 – Failure to obey order or regulation.
	Awarded - FOP ($657.00) for (2 months) suspended for 6 months; RIR (E-4) suspended for 6 months; Extra duties (30 days).

19950222:	NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 – Dereliction in the performance of duties; viol UCMJ Art. 86 (2 Specs), Absent without leave 0715 19941011 until 0715, 19941012 and 1200, 19950104 until 1700, 19950105.
	Awarded - FOP ($567.00) for (2 months); RIR (E-3); Extra duties (30 days).

19950316:	NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 – Absent without leave.
	Awarded - FOP ($478.00) for (2 months) suspended for 6 months; RIR (E-2) suspended for 6 months; Extra duties (30 days).

19950710:	Applicant failed to appear in court as required by a duly executed criminal summon.  Applicant arrested and bond set at $100.00 [Extracted from CO’s message dtd 19950817]. 

19950726:	Administrative Discharge Board held this date and by a unanimous vote of 3 to 1 recommended separation, by a vote of 2 to1 recommended characterization be General (Under Honorable Conditions) [Extracted from Record of Trial].

19950817:	Commanding Officer, Naval Hospital, P.O Box 10100, Camp Lejeune, NC recommended to Chief of Naval Personnel (PERS-83) that applicant be administratively separated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct [Extracted from Record of Trial].

19960104:	Applicant to pre-trial confinement.

19960325:	Applicant from pre-trial confinement.

Discharge Process

SPCM: Charge(s) and Specification(s):  Article 86, (2 Specs) Spec 1: Go UA from unit 19951002-19951010; Spec 2: Absent from unit 19951010 until 19960104; Article 112a, Wrongfully used marijuana between 199508 and 19950927.
Preferred:  19960215	Court-martial:  19960326	Findings:  Guilty of Article(s) 86, 112a
Sentence:  BCD; RIR E-1 	 	CA action:  19960807
NC&PB Action:  NONE    Clemency: NONE SUBMITTED    Parole:     Restoration:  				
Appellate Review Complete:  19970507	BCD ordered executed:  19970508 SSPCMCO No. 97-829
Applicant Discharged:  19970508

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:	Service and/or Medical Record:  		Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:  	
	Employment:  			Finances:  			Education: 		
	Health/Medical Records:  		Substance Abuse:			Criminal Records:  	
	Family/Personal Status: 		Community Service:  		References:  		
	
Additional Statements From Applicant:  	From Representative:    
Other Documentation (Describe)       

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A.  Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective 
03 Oct 96 until 14 Dec 98, Article 3640420, DISCHARGE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL

B.  Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

ADDENDUM:  Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures:  If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC  20301-4000.  You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint.  The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness.  You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil.”

Additional Reviews:  Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.  The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge.  Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.  If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits:  The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board.  There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities:  The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities.  Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.  

Reenlistment/RE-code:  Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code.  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.  Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.  An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment.  A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct:  DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation.  Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons.  Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended.  The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings.  If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record.  Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.”  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.  

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service.  The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.  Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.  

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief.  With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.  Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.  

Board Membership:  The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn:  Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC  20374-5023